Mingo county boe2/17/2024 ![]() Currently, West Virginia is one of only two states that do not permit a religious exemption from mandatory vaccinations. ) Others oppose vaccinations on religious or philosophical grounds. & Evidence 1 (arguing that medical issues are irrelevant ). However, little evidence supports the claim that 1 standard vaccinations are unsafe, see id., and the plaintiff does not contest the safety and efficacy of vaccines in this case. ![]() A parent s concern for her children s health and well-being is understandable. See, e.g., Alice Park, How Safe Are Vaccines?, TIME, May 21, 2008, available at. An increasing number of parents across the country question the safety of vaccinations particularly the purported relationship between vaccinations and autism. Background The case concerns the legality of West Virginia s mandatory immunization program for schoolchildren. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. For the reasons explained below, the plaintiff s Motion is DENIED, and the defendants Motions are GRANTED. Paine s Motion for Summary Judgment, and defendant Dwight Dials Motion for Summary Judgment. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Pending before the court are the plaintiff Jennifer Workman s Motion for Summary Judgment, defendants Mingo County Board of Education and Dr. 2:09-cv-00325 MINGO COUNTY SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION JENNIFER WORKMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. (Attachments: # 1 Internet Materials: Exhibit 1, How Safe Are Vaccines? # 2 Internet Materials: Exhibit 2, Pervasive Developmental Disorder - Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS) # 3 Internet Materials: Exhibit 3, WV Board of Education Meeting Minutes) (cc: attys any unrepresented party posted on the court's website at (ras) Paine's 97 MOTION to Exceed Page Limit, and Plaintiff's 118 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Medical Testimony and Evidence directing the Clerk to post this published opinion on the court's website. Paine's 98 MOTION for Summary Judgment granting Defendant Dwight Dials' 102 M OTION for Summary Judgment and denying as moot Plaintiff's 2 MOTION for TRO, Plaintiff's 73 LETTER-FORM MOTION to Continue Final Settlement Conference and Trial, Defendants Mingo County Board of Education and Dr. Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment granting Defendants Mingo County Board of Education and Dr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |